• 555
csdrake Discussions
  •  ·  560
  •  ·  561
  •  ·  473
  •  ·  185
  •  ·  177
  •  ·  145
Reposted James Prince's post.

Who Would You Trust?

 A career government bureaucrat that is also the highest paid government employee making more than the President of the United States, that has financial ties to the Chinese Communist party Wuhan lab, is constantly praised by news media that more than half of Americans have tuned out because of distrust, that constantly changes his recommendations on how to handle the Covid 19 virus, tells people to wear masks while he doesn’t, shames those who have had the virus and are now immune and not contagious to others as the spreaders, etc. to some one like the inventor of the mRNA Dr. Robert Malone. So who do you trust more; a government bureaucrat or the inventor of mRNA, which is now being labeled as a anti-vaxer in the mainstream media and silenced by big tech social media like Facebook and Twitter?

While watching an interview below including Dr. Malone notice what he says about those that received the injection with the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA. Just a side note: here is the definition of a vaccine from CDC’s website.

 A suspension of live (usually attenuated) or inactivated microorganisms (e.g. bacteria or viruses) or fractions thereof administered to induce immunity and prevent infectious diseases and their sequelae.

The mRNA shot contains a genetic modified RNA and does not have a suspension of live or inactivated microorganisms and does not meet the definition of a vaccine. So why do they call it a vaccine? 

This is why:

42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22 - Standards of responsibility (a) General rule 

Except as provided in subsections (b), (c), and (e) State law shall apply to a civil action brought for damages for a vaccine-related injury or death.

(b) Unavoidable adverse side effects; warnings


No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.

 This law transferred liability from the manufacture to the Federal Government. Why? Because the vaccine manufactures were being sued out of business for damages. Looks like they had a good lobbyist! So if they call it a vaccine, they are not responsible for any harmful side effects including death. I wonder for whose benefit that was for?

Reposted James Prince's post.

Why Did The FDA Choose Not To Inform The Public about the possible risks?

Why Did The FDA Choose Not To Inform The Public about the possible risks?

We know that the FDA knew about the possible side affects prior to the October 22, 2020 meeting since this information had to be prepared for the meeting’s slide show yet somehow forgot to inform the public. Instead they sided with CDC that they were “safe and effective”. One has to wonder safe and effective to what end.



Did both agencies conspire to withhold these side effects to push the vaccine? If so who was to benefit? It doesn’t look it was for the public's benefit. How would this affect how people perceived the safety and would that influence participating in a experimental shot(s)? One also has to ask why they have pushed this so called vaccine in every conceivably way, from celebrity endorsements to bribery? Why are they keep expanding the lower age limit to children that have a low  to non existence infection rate?

People need to quit reacting and start thinking on this whole Covid19 scenario because when you do, things begin to look inconsistent and sometimes senseless.

If you would like to watch the complete meeting here is the link (beware it is almost 9 hrs) https://youtu.be/1XTiL9rUpkg

Reposted James Prince's post.

There is a constant battle to persuade you that the only truth can be found in mainstream media and big tech social media and anything else is a conspiracy theory and false with out explaining why.

Excerpts from the article published October 30, 2016 in BMC titled

Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms

“...several typical mechanisms underlying GFN toxicity have been revealed, for instance, physical destruction, oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis. In these mechanisms, (toll-like receptors-) TLR-, transforming growth factor β- (TGF-β-) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) dependent-pathways are involved in the signalling pathway network, and oxidative stress plays a crucial role in these pathways.”

“And recently, there are some investigation on GFNs exposure in occupational settings and published data showed that the occupational exposure of GFNs had potential toxicity to the workers and researchers [27–29]. GFNs can be delivered into bodies by intratracheal instillation [30], oral administration [31], intravenous injection [32], intraperitoneal injection [33] and subcutaneous injection [34]. GFNs can induce acute and chronic injuries in tissues by penetrating through the blood-air barrier, blood-testis barrier, blood-brain barrier, and blood-placenta barrier etc. and accumulating in the lung, liver, and spleen etc. For example, some graphene nanomaterials aerosols can be inhaled and substantial deposition in the respiratory tract, and they can easily penetrate through the tracheobronchial airways and then transit down to the lower lung airways, resulting in the subsequent formation of granulomas, lung fibrosis and adverse health effects to exposed persons [2, 29].”

Many fact checkers state that graphene oxide in not in the Covid19 vaccines and may not but as stated in the article published in Nanoscale Journal in Issue 6, 2016 this technology is currently being used to enhance cancer vaccine effectiveness. It is being used in vaccine development!

Functionalized graphene oxide serves as a novel vaccine nano-adjuvant for robust stimulation of cellular immunity

There is a reason more and more people are moving away from big tech social media and news outlets. Watch video below and decide for your self instead on relying on the fact checkers and mainstream media deciding for you..

Added a post 

This is a great place for so much information on everything happening in American now. 


Reposted James Prince's post.

Immunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS Virus

 It is imperative to read this animal study done in April 2012 by the  Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas  and other branches of the University of Texas. The study conclusion : "These SARS-CoV vaccines all induced antibody and protection against infection with SARS-CoV. However, challenge of mice given any of the vaccines led to occurrence of Th2-type immunopathology suggesting hypersensitivity toSARS-CoV components was induced. Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated."

The vaccines appear to be effective in producing antibodies, but when  exposure to the Sars-CoV virus hypersensitivity was the results. The immune system overreacts and may cause additional damage to the lungs. See attached pdf.

Full Name:
Friends count:
Followers count:
Lifetime Premium
My Followed Channels
My Posts
My Pages

Freedoms Square